Security & assurance
NIST-shaped reviews, penetration testing, and remediation planning for teams that answer to legal, insurers, or federal flow-down — written for humans who sign ATOs, not buzzword bingo.
Findings mapped to controls your customer already names — fewer translation meetings.
Detection and response gaps called out with severity tied to business impact, not CVSS alone.
Remediation items written so engineering can ticket them — not vague “improve security” lines.
Capabilities
Written acceptance criteria, visible milestones, and owners named on day one.
Current-state review against CSF 2.0 and, when in scope, SP 800-171 / 800-53 families relevant to your boundary.
Key Deliverables
SSP, POA&M, and self-assessment language for CMMC-oriented contractors and SaaS vendors facing customer questionnaires.
Key Deliverables
Scoped external/internal/web-app engagements with reproduction steps devs can follow.
Key Deliverables
SIEM/EDR tuning guidance and runbooks — we are honest about what a 24×7 SOC does and does not fix.
Key Deliverables
Technology Stack
Outcomes
Figures are directional; we'll share context on a call under NDA where needed.
Typical calendar time for a mid-size org once logs and policies are accessible — larger boundaries quoted after scoping.
Managed detection offerings include written response targets; assessments are milestone-based, not hourly mystery.
Penetration tests ship with defined remediation verification — not a surprise add-on.
Why Thorium
Principals stay involved. We do not park you with a rotating bench of juniors.
Risk explained with likelihood and impact your CFO and GC recognize.
We do not invent dragons. Findings tie to exploit paths or policy failures we can show.
Comfortable with contractor environments, HIPAA-covered entities, and professional services holding client secrets.
Recommendations consider maintenance cost — not a laundry list of expensive appliances.
How It Works
Weekly checkpoints, shared backlog, and change requests in writing — so scope stays legible.
Phase 1
Systems, data classes, and assessor expectations agreed in writing — including out-of-scope lines.
Phase 2
Evidence collection with minimal disruption; read-only where possible.
Phase 3
Joint prioritization with IT; quick wins separated from multi-quarter programs.
Phase 4
Retest or continuous monitoring check-ins depending on engagement type.
Much of our portfolio is confidential. After a short intro we'll share redacted examples that match your sector and risk profile.
Washington, DC · Remote-friendly
Common Questions
Serving Washington, DC
Looking for this service in Washington, DC specifically?